CUSD vs IVV
CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CUSD | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.81% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $11M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 13.50% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 39 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +3.33% | +13.51% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.82% | +20.65% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.84% | +21.94% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -5.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | CrossingBridge | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
CUSD vs IVV Performance
CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD) is a ETF from CrossingBridge and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CUSD returned +3.82% while IVV returned +20.65%. Year to date, CUSD is up 3.33% versus a gain of 13.51% for IVV.
Over three years, CUSD compounded at +6.84% per year against +21.94% for IVV. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.02% annualized vs +5.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 3.0% for CUSD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.4% for CUSD and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.01. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CUSD charges 0.81% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $81 vs $3 annually, a gap of $78 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CUSD currently yields 13.50% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CUSD and IVV share 0 holdings out of 540 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CUSD or IVV?
CUSD has an expense ratio of 0.81% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $78 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CUSD or IVV?
Over the past year CUSD returned +3.82% vs +20.65% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), CUSD annualized +5.93% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CUSD or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 3.0% for CUSD. Worst drawdown: CUSD -5.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CUSD and IVV?
CUSD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.01, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CUSD and IVV?
CUSD and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 540 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CUSD or IVV?
CUSD yields 13.50% while IVV yields 1.10%, so CUSD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.