DBSC vs IVV
Deepwater Beachfront Small Cap ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DBSC or IVV?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DBSC is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DBSC | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 101 | 508 |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.7%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Deepwater Asset Management, LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 148 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. DBSC has data through Apr 23, 2026 and IVV through Sep 18, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DBSC charges 0.85% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DBSC currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 100 holdings in DBSC and 490 in IVV, totalling 99.3% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 243 days apart, DBSC as of Dec 31, 2025 and IVV as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in DBSC and 490 in IVV, against full books of 101 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 482 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DBSC (98.6% of the fund), and 93 for DBSC that do not appear in IVV (92.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DBSC and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DBSC or IVV?
DBSC has an expense ratio of 0.85% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, DBSC or IVV?
DBSC yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DBSC?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DBSC is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.