DBSC vs QQQ
Deepwater Beachfront Small Cap ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, DBSC or QQQ?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DBSC is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DBSC | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 101 | 107 |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.7%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Deepwater Asset Management, LLC | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 147 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. DBSC has data through Apr 23, 2026 and QQQ through Sep 17, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DBSC charges 0.85% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $18 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DBSC currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 100 holdings in DBSC and 102 in QQQ, totalling 99.3% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 217 days apart, DBSC as of Dec 31, 2025 and QQQ as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in DBSC and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 101 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 96 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for DBSC (97.5% of the fund), and 93 for DBSC that do not appear in QQQ (92.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DBSC and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DBSC or QQQ?
DBSC has an expense ratio of 0.85% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, DBSC or QQQ?
DBSC yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than DBSC?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DBSC is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.