DCMT vs IVV

DCMT vs IVV

Which is better, DCMT or IVV?

Commodities against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. DCMT led over 1Y, IVV over the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDCMTIVV
Expense Ratio0.66%0.03%Best
AUM$44M$876.4B
Dividend Yield2.67%1.06%
Holdings9508
YTD Return+44.99%Best+12.39%
1Y Return+46.16%Best+16.61%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.38%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.51%
Volatility (annualized)16.4%12.0%Best
Max Drawdown-16.0%Best-18.8%
$10,000 over 2.6 years$15,839$16,023Best
Fund FamilyDoubleLine FundsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryCommodityEquity
StyleCommoditiesLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 31, 2024May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 1, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.6 years).

DCMT vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.

DCMT vs IVV Performance

DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) is an ETF from DoubleLine Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DCMT returned +46.16% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, DCMT is up 44.99% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DCMT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 12.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.0% for DCMT and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.03. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DCMT charges 0.66% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DCMT currently yields 2.67% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 3 holdings in DCMT and 490 in IVV, totalling 6.9% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in DCMT and 490 in IVV, against full books of 9 and 508.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DCMT and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DCMTIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DCMT or IVV?

DCMT has an expense ratio of 0.66% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, DCMT or IVV?

Over the past year DCMT returned +46.16% vs +16.61% for IVV, so DCMT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DCMT or IVV?

DCMT has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 12.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DCMT -16.0% vs IVV -18.8%.

Should I hold both DCMT and IVV?

DCMT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.03, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, DCMT or IVV?

DCMT yields 2.67% while IVV yields 1.06%, so DCMT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than DCMT?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. DCMT led over 1Y, IVV over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.