DCMT vs QQQ

DCMT vs QQQ

Which is better, DCMT or QQQ?

Commodities against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DCMT led over 1Y, QQQ over the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDCMTQQQ
Expense Ratio0.66%0.18%Best
AUM$44M$483.5B
Dividend Yield2.67%0.44%
Holdings9107
YTD Return+44.99%Best+17.95%
1Y Return+46.16%Best+21.77%
3Y Return (annualized)-+25.63%
5Y Return (annualized)-+15.24%
Volatility (annualized)16.4%Best17.3%
Max Drawdown-16.0%Best-22.8%
$10,000 over 2.6 years$15,839$17,228Best
Fund FamilyDoubleLine FundsInvesco (US)
CategoryCommodityEquity
StyleCommoditiesLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJan 31, 2024Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 1, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.6 years).

DCMT vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.

DCMT vs QQQ Performance

DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) is an ETF from DoubleLine Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DCMT returned +46.16% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, DCMT is up 44.99% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 16.4% for DCMT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.0% for DCMT and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.12. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DCMT charges 0.66% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $18 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DCMT currently yields 2.67% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 3 holdings in DCMT and 102 in QQQ, totalling 6.9% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in DCMT and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 9 and 107.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DCMT and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DCMTQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DCMT or QQQ?

DCMT has an expense ratio of 0.66% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $48 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, DCMT or QQQ?

Over the past year DCMT returned +46.16% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so DCMT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DCMT or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 16.4% for DCMT. Worst drawdown: DCMT -16.0% vs QQQ -22.8%.

Should I hold both DCMT and QQQ?

DCMT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.12, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, DCMT or QQQ?

DCMT yields 2.67% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so DCMT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than DCMT?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DCMT led over 1Y, QQQ over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.