DCMT vs VTI
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DCMT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DCMT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $39M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.11% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +30.12% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.14% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | DoubleLine Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
DCMT vs VTI Performance
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) is a ETF from DoubleLine Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DCMT returned +36.14% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, DCMT is up 30.12% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DCMT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.0% for DCMT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DCMT charges 0.66% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DCMT currently yields 3.11% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DCMT and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DCMT or VTI?
DCMT has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DCMT or VTI?
Over the past year DCMT returned +36.14% vs +22.39% for VTI, so DCMT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), DCMT annualized +15.14% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DCMT or VTI?
DCMT has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DCMT -16.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DCMT and VTI?
DCMT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DCMT and VTI?
DCMT and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DCMT or VTI?
DCMT yields 3.11% while VTI yields 1.07%, so DCMT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.