DCOR vs IVV
Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DCOR or IVV?
Nearly the same fund. IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DCOR led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. DCOR is less concentrated, with 29.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DCOR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.14% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3.5B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.91% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 2,404 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +13.31%Best | +12.27% |
| 1Y Return | +18.02%Best | +17.04% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.02% | +21.24%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.08% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5%Tie | 12.5%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $17,220 | $17,733Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.0%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 13, 2023 to Sep 17, 2026 (3 years).
DCOR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
DCOR vs IVV Performance
Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) is an ETF from Dimensional and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DCOR returned +18.02% while IVV returned +17.04%. Year to date, DCOR is up 13.31% versus a gain of 12.27% for IVV.
Over three years, DCOR compounded at +20.02% per year against +21.24% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DCOR and IVV have been equally volatile, both at 12.5% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for DCOR and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DCOR charges 0.14% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $3 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DCOR currently yields 0.91% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
79.6% of DCOR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 96.1% of IVV's money is in holdings DCOR also owns.
Most of IVV is already inside DCOR. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
442 positions in common, counted across the 2,377 positions we hold weights for in DCOR and 490 in IVV, against full books of 2,404 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 42 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DCOR (2.6% of the fund), and 874 for DCOR that do not appear in IVV (18.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DCOR | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.17% | 8.07% | 1.90% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.72% | 7.02% | 1.30% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.52% | 5.69% | 1.17% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.02% | 3.84% | 0.82% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.97% | 3.00% | 1.03% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.60% | 2.65% | 1.05% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 1.55% | 2.39% | 0.84% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.85% | 1.90% | 0.05% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.39% | 1.44% | 0.05% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.19% | 1.63% | 0.44% |
96.1% of IVV is already inside DCOR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DCOR or IVV?
DCOR has an expense ratio of 0.14% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DCOR or IVV?
Over the past year DCOR returned +18.02% vs +17.04% for IVV, so DCOR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DCOR or IVV?
DCOR and IVV have been equally volatile, both at 12.5% annualized. Worst drawdown: DCOR -19.1% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both DCOR and IVV?
DCOR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DCOR and IVV?
96.1% of IVV's money is in holdings DCOR also owns. 96.1% of IVV's is in holdings DCOR also owns. They hold 442 positions in common, counted across the 2,377 positions we hold weights for in DCOR and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DCOR or IVV?
DCOR yields 0.91% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DCOR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DCOR led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. DCOR is less concentrated, with 29.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.