DDLS vs VTI

DDLS vs VTI

Which is better, DDLS or VTI?

Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DDLS is less concentrated, with 5.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTILess Concentrated: DDLS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDDLSVTI
Expense Ratio0.48%0.03%Best
AUM$424M$690.1B
Dividend Yield3.49%1.03%
Holdings1,0683,524
YTD Return+3.54%+12.51%Best
1Y Return+6.88%+15.23%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+16.95%+22.50%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+8.87%+12.31%Best
Volatility (annualized)13.4%Best15.4%
Max Drawdown-36.8%-35.0%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$15,295$17,869Best
Top 10 Weight5.7%Best33.3%
Fund FamilyWisdomTree InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 7, 2016May 24, 2001

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 7, 2016 to Oct 1, 2026 (10.7 years).

DDLS vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.7 years both funds cover.

DDLS vs VTI Performance

WisdomTree Dynamic International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DDLS returned +6.88% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, DDLS is up 3.54% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.

Over three years, DDLS compounded at +16.95% per year against +22.50% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.87% and +12.31% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.04% annualized vs +9.30%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 13.4% for DDLS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.8% for DDLS and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DDLS charges 0.48% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DDLS currently yields 3.49% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

DDLS already in VTI1.2%

1.2% of DDLS's money is in holdings VTI also owns.

DDLS and VTI share little of their money.

5 positions in common, counted across the 1,034 positions we hold weights for in DDLS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 1,068 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,148 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for DDLS (97.4% of the fund), and 6 for DDLS that do not appear in VTI (0.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in DDLSWeight in VTIDifference
FRFirst Industrial Realty Trust, Inc0.52%0.01%0.51%
IPARInter Parfums Inc0.20%0.00%0.20%
BILLBill.Com Holdings, Inc. Common Stock0.17%0.01%0.16%
SRG:AUSrg Global Ltd0.17%0.00%0.17%
AMALAmalgamated Bank0.11%0.00%0.11%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DDLS and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DDLSVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DDLS or VTI?

DDLS has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, DDLS or VTI?

Over the past year DDLS returned +6.88% vs +15.23% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), DDLS annualized +9.30% vs +14.04% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DDLS or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 13.4% for DDLS. Worst drawdown: DDLS -36.8% vs VTI -35.0%.

Should I hold both DDLS and VTI?

DDLS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between DDLS and VTI?

1.2% of DDLS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.0% of VTI's is in holdings DDLS also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 1,034 positions we hold weights for in DDLS and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, DDLS or VTI?

DDLS yields 3.49% while VTI yields 1.03%, so DDLS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than DDLS?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DDLS is less concentrated, with 5.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.