DFGR vs QQQ
Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. DFGR offers more diversification with 444 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DFGR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.22% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $3.9B | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.70% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 467 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +11.44% | +17.85% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.59% | +26.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.03% | +26.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.16% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2022 | Mar 10, 1999 |
DFGR vs QQQ Performance
Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) is a ETF from Dimensional and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DFGR returned +14.59% while QQQ returned +26.45%. Year to date, DFGR is up 11.44% versus a gain of 17.85% for QQQ.
Over three years, DFGR compounded at +10.03% per year against +26.07% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.09% annualized vs +7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.9% for DFGR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.3% for DFGR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DFGR charges 0.22% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $22 vs $18 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFGR currently yields 3.70% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
DFGR and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 547 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DFGR or QQQ?
DFGR has an expense ratio of 0.22% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DFGR or QQQ?
Over the past year DFGR returned +14.59% vs +26.45% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DFGR annualized +7.98% vs +13.09% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DFGR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.9% for DFGR. Worst drawdown: DFGR -21.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both DFGR and QQQ?
DFGR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DFGR and QQQ?
DFGR and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 547 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DFGR or QQQ?
DFGR yields 3.70% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so DFGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.