DFGR vs VTI
Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DFGR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.22% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.9B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.70% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 467 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.00% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.85% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.40% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
DFGR vs VTI Performance
Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) is a ETF from Dimensional and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DFGR returned +14.85% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, DFGR is up 13.00% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, DFGR compounded at +10.40% per year against +21.12% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, DFGR has the edge at +8.41% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DFGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.3% for DFGR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DFGR charges 0.22% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $22 vs $3 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFGR currently yields 3.70% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DFGR and VTI share 100 holdings out of 3127 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DFGR or VTI?
DFGR has an expense ratio of 0.22% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $19 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DFGR or VTI?
Over the past year DFGR returned +14.85% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DFGR annualized +8.41% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DFGR or VTI?
DFGR has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DFGR -21.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DFGR and VTI?
DFGR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DFGR and VTI?
DFGR and VTI share 100 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3127 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DFGR or VTI?
DFGR yields 3.70% while VTI yields 1.07%, so DFGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.