DIM vs IVV
WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DIM or IVV?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DIM is less concentrated, with 8.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DIM | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $167M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.97% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 608 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +12.97%Best | +12.70% |
| 1Y Return | +18.91% | +19.36%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.54% | +21.16%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.07% | +12.75%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -64.7% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,436 | $18,221Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 8.6%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2006 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2006 to Sep 8, 2026 (20.2 years).
DIM vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20.2 years both funds cover.
DIM vs IVV Performance
WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DIM returned +18.91% while IVV returned +19.36%. Year to date, DIM is up 12.97% versus a gain of 12.70% for IVV.
Over three years, DIM compounded at +19.54% per year against +21.16% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.07% and +12.75% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.79% annualized vs +3.95%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DIM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 15.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.7% for DIM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DIM charges 0.58% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DIM currently yields 2.97% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.3% of DIM's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 589 positions we hold weights for in DIM and 504 in IVV, against full books of 608 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 492 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DIM (99.2% of the fund), and 9 for DIM that do not appear in IVV (2.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DIM | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| APAApa Corp | 0.28% | 0.02% | 0.26% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DIM and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DIM or IVV?
DIM has an expense ratio of 0.58% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DIM or IVV?
Over the past year DIM returned +18.91% vs +19.36% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), DIM annualized +3.95% vs +9.79% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DIM or IVV?
DIM has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 15.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DIM -64.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DIM and IVV?
DIM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DIM or IVV?
DIM yields 2.97% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DIM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DIM?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DIM is less concentrated, with 8.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.