DIVP vs VTI
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DIVP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $57M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.49% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.10% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.34% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Cullen Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 6, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
DIVP vs VTI Performance
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) is a ETF from Cullen Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DIVP returned +15.34% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, DIVP is up 12.10% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 10.1% for DIVP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.4% for DIVP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DIVP charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DIVP currently yields 6.49% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DIVP and VTI share 30 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DIVP or VTI?
DIVP has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DIVP or VTI?
Over the past year DIVP returned +15.34% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DIVP annualized +10.35% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DIVP or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 10.1% for DIVP. Worst drawdown: DIVP -13.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DIVP and VTI?
DIVP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DIVP and VTI?
DIVP and VTI share 30 common holdings with a 5.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DIVP or VTI?
DIVP yields 6.49% while VTI yields 1.07%, so DIVP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.