DRKY vs IVV

DRKY vs IVV

Which is better, DRKY or IVV?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. DRKY led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 77.7%.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns (1Y): DRKYLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDRKYIVV
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%Best
AUM$19M$886.7B
Dividend Yield13.07%1.10%
Holdings70508
YTD Return+9.64%+13.39%Best
1Y Return+23.06%Best+20.08%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.29%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.88%
Top 10 Weight77.7%37.9%Best
Fund FamilyVistaSharesiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 8, 2025May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

DRKY vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

DRKY vs IVV Performance

VistaShares Target 15 DRUKMacro Distribution ETF (DRKY) is an ETF from VistaShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DRKY returned +23.06% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, DRKY is up 9.64% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DRKY charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DRKY currently yields 13.07% against 1.10% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

DRKY already in IVV4.8%
IVV already in DRKY7.0%

4.8% of DRKY's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 7.0% of IVV's money is in holdings DRKY also owns.

IVV and DRKY share little of their money.

2 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in DRKY and 504 in IVV, against full books of 70 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 490 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DRKY (92.2% of the fund), and 11 for DRKY that do not appear in IVV (69.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in DRKYWeight in IVVDifference
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.06%4.01%1.95%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.72%2.98%0.26%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DRKY and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DRKYIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DRKY or IVV?

DRKY has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, DRKY or IVV?

Over the past year DRKY returned +23.06% vs +20.08% for IVV, so DRKY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between DRKY and IVV?

7.0% of IVV's money is in holdings DRKY also owns. 7.0% of IVV's is in holdings DRKY also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in DRKY and 504 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, DRKY or IVV?

DRKY yields 13.07% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DRKY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than DRKY?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. DRKY led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 77.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.