DUBS vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. DUBS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: DUBSMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDUBSIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.41%0.03%
AUM$392M$865.2B
Dividend Yield2.00%1.09%
Holdings7508
YTD Return+15.00%+13.72%
1Y Return+23.82%+21.64%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.23%+21.55%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.27%
Volatility (annualized)12.2%15.1%
Max Drawdown-18.5%-56.5%
Fund FamilyAptus ETFsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 14, 2023May 15, 2000

DUBS vs IVV Performance

Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) is a ETF from Aptus ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DUBS returned +23.82% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, DUBS is up 15.00% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.

Over three years, DUBS compounded at +21.23% per year against +21.55% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, DUBS has the edge at +21.05% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.2% for DUBS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.5% for DUBS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DUBS charges 0.41% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $3 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUBS currently yields 2.00% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

DUBS and IVV share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DUBS or IVV?

DUBS has an expense ratio of 0.41% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $38 per year of difference.

Which performed better, DUBS or IVV?

Over the past year DUBS returned +23.82% vs +21.64% for IVV, so DUBS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), DUBS annualized +21.05% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, DUBS or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.2% for DUBS. Worst drawdown: DUBS -18.5% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both DUBS and IVV?

DUBS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between DUBS and IVV?

DUBS and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, DUBS or IVV?

DUBS yields 2.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so DUBS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.