DVDN vs IVV
Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DVDN | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 14.01% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 19 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -12.87% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | -20.04% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Kingsbarn Capital Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 17, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
DVDN vs IVV Performance
Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF (DVDN) is a ETF from Kingsbarn Capital Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DVDN returned -20.04% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, DVDN is down 12.87% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DVDN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.6% for DVDN and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DVDN charges 1.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $165 vs $3 annually, a gap of $162 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DVDN currently yields 14.01% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DVDN and IVV share 0 holdings out of 522 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DVDN or IVV?
DVDN has an expense ratio of 1.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $162 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DVDN or IVV?
Over the past year DVDN returned -20.04% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), DVDN annualized -5.38% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DVDN or IVV?
DVDN has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DVDN -34.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DVDN and IVV?
DVDN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DVDN and IVV?
DVDN and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 522 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DVDN or IVV?
DVDN yields 14.01% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DVDN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.