DVDN vs QQQ
Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DVDN | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.65% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $3M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 14.01% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 19 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -12.87% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | -20.04% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Kingsbarn Capital Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 17, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
DVDN vs QQQ Performance
Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF (DVDN) is a ETF from Kingsbarn Capital Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DVDN returned -20.04% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, DVDN is down 12.87% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.2% for DVDN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.6% for DVDN and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DVDN charges 1.65% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $165 vs $18 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DVDN currently yields 14.01% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
DVDN and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 119 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DVDN or QQQ?
DVDN has an expense ratio of 1.65% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DVDN or QQQ?
Over the past year DVDN returned -20.04% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), DVDN annualized -5.38% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DVDN or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.2% for DVDN. Worst drawdown: DVDN -34.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both DVDN and QQQ?
DVDN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DVDN and QQQ?
DVDN and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 119 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DVDN or QQQ?
DVDN yields 14.01% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so DVDN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.