DVDN vs VTI
Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DVDN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 14.01% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 19 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -12.87% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -20.04% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Kingsbarn Capital Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 17, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
DVDN vs VTI Performance
Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF (DVDN) is a ETF from Kingsbarn Capital Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DVDN returned -20.04% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, DVDN is down 12.87% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.2% for DVDN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.6% for DVDN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DVDN charges 1.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $165 vs $3 annually, a gap of $162 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DVDN currently yields 14.01% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DVDN and VTI share 10 holdings out of 2794 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DVDN or VTI?
DVDN has an expense ratio of 1.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $162 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DVDN or VTI?
Over the past year DVDN returned -20.04% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), DVDN annualized -5.38% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DVDN or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.2% for DVDN. Worst drawdown: DVDN -34.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DVDN and VTI?
DVDN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DVDN and VTI?
DVDN and VTI share 10 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2794 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DVDN or VTI?
DVDN yields 14.01% while VTI yields 1.07%, so DVDN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.