DWSH vs VTI
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DWSH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 6.22% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.98% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 101 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -14.05% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | -14.13% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -6.21% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -4.78% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -84.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
DWSH vs VTI Performance
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DWSH returned -14.13% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, DWSH is down 14.05% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, DWSH compounded at -6.21% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -4.78% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -14.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DWSH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -84.2% for DWSH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.83. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DWSH charges 6.22% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $622 vs $3 annually, a gap of $619 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DWSH currently yields 6.98% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DWSH and VTI share 82 holdings out of 2804 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DWSH or VTI?
DWSH has an expense ratio of 6.22% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $619 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DWSH or VTI?
Over the past year DWSH returned -14.13% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DWSH annualized -14.71% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DWSH or VTI?
DWSH has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DWSH -84.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DWSH and VTI?
DWSH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DWSH and VTI?
DWSH and VTI share 82 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2804 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DWSH or VTI?
DWSH yields 6.98% while VTI yields 1.07%, so DWSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.