DYLD vs FFTI
LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF vs FormulaFolios Tactical Income ETF
Which is better, DYLD or FFTI?
Each has led over a different period.
DYLD has a lower expense ratio. DYLD led over the full window, FFTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DYLD | FFTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75%Best | 0.96% |
| AUM | $35M | $69M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.24% | 2.40% |
| Holdings | 65 | 5 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.9% | 5.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.0%Best | -16.0% |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $9,954Best | $8,740 |
| Fund Family | LeaderShares | FormulaFolio Funds |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | Diversified Sectoral Bond | Diversified Sectoral Bond |
| Inception | Jun 28, 2021 | Jun 6, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 712 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. DYLD has data through Oct 14, 2026 and FFTI through Nov 1, 2024.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 29, 2021 to Nov 1, 2024 (3.3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DYLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.9% compared with 5.6% for FFTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.0% for DYLD and -16.0% for FFTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DYLD charges 0.75% per year while FFTI charges 0.96%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $96 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DYLD currently yields 4.24% against 2.40% for FFTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DYLD and FFTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DYLD or FFTI?
DYLD has an expense ratio of 0.75% while FFTI charges 0.96%. DYLD is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, DYLD or FFTI?
DYLD has been the more volatile fund at 5.9% annualized versus 5.6% for FFTI. Worst drawdown: DYLD -15.0% vs FFTI -16.0%.
Should I hold both DYLD and FFTI?
DYLD and FFTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DYLD or FFTI?
DYLD yields 4.24% while FFTI yields 2.40%, so DYLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FFTI better than DYLD?
DYLD has a lower expense ratio. DYLD led over the full window, FFTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.