DYLD vs IVV
LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DYLD or IVV?
Diversified Sectoral Bond against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DYLD | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $39M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.25% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 174 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +0.98% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.63% | +17.30%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.63% | +23.04%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.51% | +13.63%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.9%Best | 15.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.0%Best | -24.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,258 | $18,944Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.5% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | LeaderShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Diversified Sectoral Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 28, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 29, 2021 to Sep 22, 2026 (5.2 years).
DYLD vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.2 years both funds cover.
DYLD vs IVV Performance
LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF (DYLD) is an ETF from LeaderShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DYLD returned +1.63% while IVV returned +17.30%. Year to date, DYLD is up 0.98% versus a gain of 14.14% for IVV.
Over three years, DYLD compounded at +4.63% per year against +23.04% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +0.51% and +13.63% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 4.9% for DYLD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.0% for DYLD and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DYLD charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DYLD currently yields 4.25% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
88.3% of DYLD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 31.6% of IVV's money is in holdings DYLD also owns.
Most of DYLD is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
28 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in DYLD and 490 in IVV, against full books of 174 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 454 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DYLD (67.0% of the fund), and 3 for DYLD that do not appear in IVV (9.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DYLD | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 8.61% | 7.02% | 1.59% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.81% | 8.07% | 4.26% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 9.36% | 0.35% | 9.01% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 8.15% | 1.01% | 7.14% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.98% | 5.69% | 3.71% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.30% | 1.44% | 2.86% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 4.97% | 0.55% | 4.42% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 4.73% | 0.26% | 4.47% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 4.57% | 0.16% | 4.41% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 4.59% | 0.03% | 4.56% |
88.3% of DYLD is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DYLD or IVV?
DYLD has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DYLD or IVV?
Over the past year DYLD returned +1.63% vs +17.30% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DYLD or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 4.9% for DYLD. Worst drawdown: DYLD -15.0% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both DYLD and IVV?
DYLD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DYLD and IVV?
88.3% of DYLD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 31.6% of IVV's is in holdings DYLD also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in DYLD and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DYLD or IVV?
DYLD yields 4.25% while IVV yields 1.06%, so DYLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DYLD?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.