DYLD vs IVV
LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DYLD | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $39M | $886.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.26% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 174 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.94% | +12.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.51% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.45% | +21.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.58% | +12.62% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | LeaderShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 28, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
DYLD vs IVV Performance
LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF (DYLD) is a ETF from LeaderShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DYLD returned +2.51% while IVV returned +20.92%. Year to date, DYLD is up 0.94% versus a gain of 12.64% for IVV.
Over three years, DYLD compounded at +4.45% per year against +21.07% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +0.58% and +12.62% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +0.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 4.9% for DYLD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.0% for DYLD and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DYLD charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DYLD currently yields 4.26% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DYLD and IVV share 34 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 23.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DYLD or IVV?
DYLD has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DYLD or IVV?
Over the past year DYLD returned +2.51% vs +20.92% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), DYLD annualized +0.97% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DYLD or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 4.9% for DYLD. Worst drawdown: DYLD -15.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DYLD and IVV?
DYLD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DYLD and IVV?
DYLD and IVV share 34 common holdings with a 23.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DYLD or IVV?
DYLD yields 4.26% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DYLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.