EBUF vs VTI
Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EBUF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $41M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +10.58% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.08% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.7% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 1, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
EBUF vs VTI Performance
Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EBUF returned +15.08% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, EBUF is up 10.58% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 4.7% for EBUF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.5% for EBUF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EBUF charges 0.89% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EBUF currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EBUF or VTI?
EBUF has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EBUF or VTI?
Over the past year EBUF returned +15.08% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EBUF annualized +12.27% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EBUF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 4.7% for EBUF. Worst drawdown: EBUF -6.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EBUF and VTI?
EBUF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, EBUF or VTI?
EBUF yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.