ECH vs VTI
iShares MSCI Chile ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ECH delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.97% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 30 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.37% | +14.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.93% | +22.11% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.01% | +22.37% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.94% | +12.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -74.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
ECH vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ECH returned +24.93% while VTI returned +22.11%. Year to date, ECH is up 0.37% versus a gain of 14.31% for VTI.
Over three years, ECH compounded at +15.01% per year against +22.37% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.94% and +12.40% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +1.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -74.2% for ECH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECH charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECH currently yields 1.97% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ECH and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2813 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECH or VTI?
ECH has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ECH or VTI?
Over the past year ECH returned +24.93% vs +22.11% for VTI, so ECH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), ECH annualized +1.24% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ECH or VTI?
ECH has been the more volatile fund at 25.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ECH -74.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ECH and VTI?
ECH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ECH and VTI?
ECH and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2813 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECH or VTI?
ECH yields 1.97% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ECH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.