EDIV vs VTI
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDIV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.2B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.19% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 139 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +9.24% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.95% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.21% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.25% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -64.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
EDIV vs VTI Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDIV returned +12.95% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, EDIV is up 9.24% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, EDIV compounded at +17.21% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.25% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +0.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.1% for EDIV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDIV charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDIV currently yields 4.19% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EDIV and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2891 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDIV or VTI?
EDIV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDIV or VTI?
Over the past year EDIV returned +12.95% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EDIV annualized +0.35% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDIV or VTI?
EDIV has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EDIV -64.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EDIV and VTI?
EDIV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDIV and VTI?
EDIV and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2891 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDIV or VTI?
EDIV yields 4.19% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.