EDIV vs VYM
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDIV | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $1.2B | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.19% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 139 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +8.51% | +15.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.56% | +23.85% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.98% | +19.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.83% | +12.45% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -64.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2011 | Nov 10, 2006 |
EDIV vs VYM Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDIV returned +11.56% while VYM returned +23.85%. Year to date, EDIV is up 8.51% versus a gain of 15.75% for VYM.
Over three years, EDIV compounded at +16.98% per year against +19.14% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.83% and +12.45% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +0.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.1% for EDIV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDIV charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDIV currently yields 4.19% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
EDIV and VYM share 1 holdings out of 706 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EDIV | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEL | 0.25% | 0.24% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDIV or VYM?
EDIV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDIV or VYM?
Over the past year EDIV returned +11.56% vs +23.85% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EDIV annualized +0.31% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDIV or VYM?
EDIV has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EDIV -64.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both EDIV and VYM?
EDIV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDIV and VYM?
EDIV and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 706 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDIV or VYM?
EDIV yields 4.19% while VYM yields 2.24%, so EDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.