EDIV vs VOO
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDIV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.2B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.19% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 139 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +8.51% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.56% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.98% | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.83% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -64.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2011 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EDIV vs VOO Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDIV returned +11.56% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, EDIV is up 8.51% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Over three years, EDIV compounded at +16.98% per year against +22.09% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.83% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.50% annualized vs +0.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.1% for EDIV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDIV charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDIV currently yields 4.19% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EDIV and VOO share 0 holdings out of 609 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDIV or VOO?
EDIV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDIV or VOO?
Over the past year EDIV returned +11.56% vs +20.69% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EDIV annualized +0.31% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDIV or VOO?
EDIV has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EDIV -64.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EDIV and VOO?
EDIV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDIV and VOO?
EDIV and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 609 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDIV or VOO?
EDIV yields 4.19% while VOO yields 1.08%, so EDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.