EEMA vs IVV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EEMA delivered stronger 1-year returns. EEMA offers more diversification with 779 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EEMA | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $831M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.31% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 899 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +18.66% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +37.98% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.75% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.56% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 8, 2012 | May 15, 2000 |
EEMA vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EEMA returned +37.98% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, EEMA is up 18.66% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Over three years, EEMA compounded at +22.75% per year against +21.47% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.56% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +5.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EEMA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.3% for EEMA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EEMA charges 0.49% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEMA currently yields 1.31% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EEMA and IVV share 3 holdings out of 1281 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EEMA or IVV?
EEMA has an expense ratio of 0.49% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EEMA or IVV?
Over the past year EEMA returned +37.98% vs +22.61% for IVV, so EEMA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EEMA annualized +5.87% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EEMA or IVV?
EEMA has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EEMA -44.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EEMA and IVV?
EEMA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EEMA and IVV?
EEMA and IVV share 3 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1281 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EEMA or IVV?
EEMA yields 1.31% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EEMA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.