EEMA vs QQQ
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EEMA or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. EEMA led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EEMA is less concentrated, with 38.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EEMA | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $900M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.32% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 897 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +21.50% | +22.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | +27.65%Best | +24.33% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.89% | +29.05%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.24% | +17.00%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0%Best | 17.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -44.3% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,556 | $21,924Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.4%Best | 47.2% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 8, 2012 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 9, 2012 to Oct 2, 2026 (14.6 years).
EEMA vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.6 years both funds cover.
EEMA vs QQQ Performance
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EEMA returned +27.65% while QQQ returned +24.33%. Year to date, EEMA is up 21.50% versus a gain of 22.67% for QQQ.
Over three years, EEMA compounded at +25.89% per year against +29.05% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.24% and +17.00% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.71% annualized vs +5.99%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 17.0% for EEMA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.3% for EEMA and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EEMA charges 0.49% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $18 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEMA currently yields 1.32% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
0.4% of EEMA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings EEMA also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 887 positions we hold weights for in EEMA and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 897 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 95 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for EEMA (97.5% of the fund), and 7 for EEMA that do not appear in QQQ (7.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EEMA | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDDPDD Holdings Inc. (ADR) | 0.40% | 0.23% | 0.17% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EEMA and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EEMA or QQQ?
EEMA has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EEMA or QQQ?
Over the past year EEMA returned +27.65% vs +24.33% for QQQ, so EEMA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EEMA annualized +5.99% vs +18.71% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EEMA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 17.0% for EEMA. Worst drawdown: EEMA -44.3% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both EEMA and QQQ?
EEMA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EEMA or QQQ?
EEMA yields 1.32% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so EEMA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EEMA?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. EEMA led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EEMA is less concentrated, with 38.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.