EEMA vs VXUS

Quick Verdict

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. EEMA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns: EEMAMore Diversified: VXUS

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEEMAVXUSWinner
Expense Ratio0.49%0.05%
AUM$831M$156.5B
Dividend Yield1.31%2.60%
Holdings8998,747
YTD Return+18.66%+14.19%
1Y Return+37.98%+27.38%
3Y Return (annualized)+22.75%+19.53%
5Y Return (annualized)+7.56%+9.03%
Volatility (annualized)17.1%15.1%
Max Drawdown-44.3%-39.9%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionFeb 8, 2012Jan 26, 2011

EEMA vs VXUS Performance

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EEMA returned +37.98% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, EEMA is up 18.66% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.

Over three years, EEMA compounded at +22.75% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +7.56% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, EEMA has the edge at +5.87% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

EEMA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.3% for EEMA and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EEMA charges 0.49% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $5 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEMA currently yields 1.31% against 2.60% for VXUS.

Holdings Overlap

13.0%overlap

EEMA and VXUS share 503 holdings out of 8137 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in EEMAWeight in VXUSDifference
2330:TW15.15%3.41%11.74%
000660:KR3.67%0.90%2.77%
9988:HK2.06%0.73%1.33%
2454:TWProProPro
2308:TWProProPro
2317:TWProProPro
RELIANCE:MBProProPro
402340:KRProProPro
ICICIBANK:MBProProPro
PDDProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See all 10 holdings EEMA shares with VXUS
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$45/quarter Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EEMA or VXUS?

EEMA has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.

Which performed better, EEMA or VXUS?

Over the past year EEMA returned +37.98% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so EEMA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EEMA annualized +5.87% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, EEMA or VXUS?

EEMA has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: EEMA -44.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.

Should I hold both EEMA and VXUS?

EEMA and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between EEMA and VXUS?

EEMA and VXUS share 503 common holdings with a 13.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8137 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, EEMA or VXUS?

EEMA yields 1.31% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.