EEMS vs IVV
Ishares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. EEMS offers more diversification with 1470 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EEMS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.73% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $357M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.81% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,875 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +10.73% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.23% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.53% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.80% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 16, 2011 | May 15, 2000 |
EEMS vs IVV Performance
Ishares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EEMS) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EEMS returned +19.23% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, EEMS is up 10.73% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Over three years, EEMS compounded at +14.53% per year against +21.47% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.80% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +3.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EEMS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.7% for EEMS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EEMS charges 0.73% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $73 vs $3 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEMS currently yields 2.81% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EEMS and IVV share 1 holdings out of 1974 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EEMS | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLA | 0.42% | 0.15% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EEMS or IVV?
EEMS has an expense ratio of 0.73% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $70 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EEMS or IVV?
Over the past year EEMS returned +19.23% vs +22.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EEMS annualized +3.82% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EEMS or IVV?
EEMS has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EEMS -51.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EEMS and IVV?
EEMS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EEMS and IVV?
EEMS and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1974 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EEMS or IVV?
EEMS yields 2.81% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EEMS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.