EEMX vs IVV
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EEMX or IVV?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EEMX led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EEMX | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $187M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.80% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 1,070 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +22.92%Best | +12.51% |
| 1Y Return | +34.36%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.16%Best | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.69% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.9% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,169 | $18,384Best |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 25, 2016 to Sep 11, 2026 (9.9 years).
EEMX vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.9 years both funds cover.
EEMX vs IVV Performance
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (EEMX) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EEMX returned +34.36% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, EEMX is up 22.92% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Over three years, EEMX compounded at +24.16% per year against +21.27% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.69% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.62% annualized vs +7.99%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EEMX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 15.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.9% for EEMX and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EEMX charges 0.30% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEMX currently yields 1.80% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1,013 holdings in EEMX and 505 in IVV, totalling 91.7% and 100.0% of the two funds. That is not enough of EEMX to divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
The two holdings books were reported 127 days apart, EEMX as of Mar 31, 2026 and IVV as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 1,013 positions we hold weights for in EEMX and 505 in IVV, against full books of 1,070 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EEMX | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAL:MBHindustan Aeronautics Ltd | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EEMX and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EEMX or IVV?
EEMX has an expense ratio of 0.30% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EEMX or IVV?
Over the past year EEMX returned +34.36% vs +17.57% for IVV, so EEMX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), EEMX annualized +7.99% vs +14.62% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EEMX or IVV?
EEMX has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 15.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EEMX -39.9% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both EEMX and IVV?
EEMX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EEMX or IVV?
EEMX yields 1.80% while IVV yields 1.06%, so EEMX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EEMX?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EEMX led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.