EEMX vs VOO
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EEMX delivered stronger 1-year returns. EEMX offers more diversification with 1,070 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EEMX | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $184M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.86% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 1,070 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +19.72% | +13.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +37.09% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.77% | +22.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.32% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EEMX vs VOO Performance
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (EEMX) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EEMX returned +37.09% while VOO returned +21.62%. Year to date, EEMX is up 19.72% versus a gain of 13.20% for VOO.
Over three years, EEMX compounded at +23.77% per year against +22.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.32% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.51% annualized vs +7.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EEMX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.9% for EEMX and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EEMX charges 0.30% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEMX currently yields 1.86% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EEMX and VOO share 0 holdings out of 1518 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EEMX or VOO?
EEMX has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EEMX or VOO?
Over the past year EEMX returned +37.09% vs +21.62% for VOO, so EEMX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), EEMX annualized +7.75% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EEMX or VOO?
EEMX has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EEMX -39.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EEMX and VOO?
EEMX and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EEMX and VOO?
EEMX and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1518 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EEMX or VOO?
EEMX yields 1.86% while VOO yields 1.08%, so EEMX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.