EFAD vs VTI
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFAD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $62M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.64% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 78 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +7.58% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.37% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.46% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.61% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
EFAD vs VTI Performance
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EFAD returned +7.37% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, EFAD is up 7.58% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, EFAD compounded at +8.46% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.61% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs +3.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.2% for EFAD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.7% for EFAD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFAD charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFAD currently yields 2.64% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EFAD and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2858 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFAD or VTI?
EFAD has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EFAD or VTI?
Over the past year EFAD returned +7.37% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), EFAD annualized +3.08% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EFAD or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.2% for EFAD. Worst drawdown: EFAD -35.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EFAD and VTI?
EFAD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EFAD and VTI?
EFAD and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2858 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFAD or VTI?
EFAD yields 2.64% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EFAD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.