EFAD vs IVV
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFAD | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $62M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.64% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 78 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +7.67% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.46% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.39% | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.75% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2014 | May 15, 2000 |
EFAD vs IVV Performance
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) is a ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EFAD returned +7.46% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, EFAD is up 7.67% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, EFAD compounded at +8.39% per year against +21.77% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +0.75% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +3.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.2% for EFAD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.7% for EFAD and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFAD charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFAD currently yields 2.64% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EFAD and IVV share 0 holdings out of 580 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFAD or IVV?
EFAD has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EFAD or IVV?
Over the past year EFAD returned +7.46% vs +23.01% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), EFAD annualized +3.09% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EFAD or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.2% for EFAD. Worst drawdown: EFAD -35.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EFAD and IVV?
EFAD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EFAD and IVV?
EFAD and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 580 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFAD or IVV?
EFAD yields 2.64% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EFAD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.