EFAD vs VOO
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFAD | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $62M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.64% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 78 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +7.67% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.46% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.39% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.75% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EFAD vs VOO Performance
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EFAD returned +7.46% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, EFAD is up 7.67% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, EFAD compounded at +8.39% per year against +21.78% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.75% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +3.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EFAD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.7% for EFAD and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFAD charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFAD currently yields 2.64% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EFAD and VOO share 0 holdings out of 580 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFAD or VOO?
EFAD has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EFAD or VOO?
Over the past year EFAD returned +7.46% vs +23.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), EFAD annualized +3.09% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EFAD or VOO?
EFAD has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EFAD -35.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EFAD and VOO?
EFAD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EFAD and VOO?
EFAD and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 580 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFAD or VOO?
EFAD yields 2.64% while VOO yields 1.09%, so EFAD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.