EFG vs VOO
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EFG or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EFG is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $16.7B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.24% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 380 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +4.86% | +11.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.19% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.79% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.94% | +12.80%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.8% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,559 | $18,262Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 21.0%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 1, 2005 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 10, 2026 (16 years).
EFG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
EFG vs VOO Performance
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EFG returned +9.19% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, EFG is up 4.86% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Over three years, EFG compounded at +11.79% per year against +20.71% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +2.94% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.35% annualized vs +7.04%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EFG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.8% for EFG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFG charges 0.34% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $3 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFG currently yields 2.24% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
0.7% of EFG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's money is in holdings EFG also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, EFG as of Aug 31, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
2 positions in common, counted across the 346 positions we hold weights for in EFG and 505 in VOO, against full books of 380 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 495 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for EFG (99.4% of the fund), and 8 for EFG that do not appear in VOO (1.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EFG and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFG or VOO?
EFG has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EFG or VOO?
Over the past year EFG returned +9.19% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EFG annualized +7.04% vs +13.35% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EFG or VOO?
EFG has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EFG -35.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EFG and VOO?
EFG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFG or VOO?
EFG yields 2.24% while VOO yields 1.04%, so EFG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than EFG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EFG is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.