EFT vs QQQ
Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income Trust vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EFT or QQQ?
Bank Loan against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFT | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 5.35% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $380M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.74% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 501 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -1.29% | +15.86%Best |
| 1Y Return | -4.15% | +22.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.35% | +24.15%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.32% | +14.16%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1%Best | 18.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -66.4% | -53.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,678 | $19,390Best |
| Fund Family | Eaton Vance | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Bank Loan | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2004 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 25, 2004 to Sep 10, 2026 (22.2 years).
EFT vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EFT vs QQQ Performance
Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income Trust (EFT) is an ETF from Eaton Vance and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EFT returned -4.15% while QQQ returned +22.63%. Year to date, EFT is down 1.29% versus a gain of 15.86% for QQQ.
Over three years, EFT compounded at +4.35% per year against +24.15% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +1.32% and +14.16% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +14.34% annualized vs -0.69%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 14.1% for EFT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.4% for EFT and -53.5% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFT charges 5.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $535 vs $18 annually, a gap of $517 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFT currently yields 7.74% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 175 holdings in EFT and 102 in QQQ, totalling 63.7% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 248 days apart, EFT as of Nov 30, 2025 and QQQ as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 175 positions we hold weights for in EFT and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 501 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EFT and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFT or QQQ?
EFT has an expense ratio of 5.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $517 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EFT or QQQ?
Over the past year EFT returned -4.15% vs +22.63% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), EFT annualized -0.69% vs +14.34% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EFT or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 14.1% for EFT. Worst drawdown: EFT -66.4% vs QQQ -53.5%.
Should I hold both EFT and QQQ?
EFT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFT or QQQ?
EFT yields 7.74% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EFT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EFT?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.