EFV vs QQQ
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EFV or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. EFV led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EFV is less concentrated, with 19.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFV | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.31% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $31.7B | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.47% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 427 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +12.83% | +15.86%Best |
| 1Y Return | +23.44%Best | +22.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.26% | +24.15%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.82% | +14.16%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 36.1% | 18.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -74.5% | -53.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,103 | $19,390Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 19.2%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 1, 2005 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 5, 2005 to Sep 10, 2026 (21.1 years).
EFV vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 21.1 years both funds cover.
EFV vs QQQ Performance
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EFV returned +23.44% while QQQ returned +22.63%. Year to date, EFV is up 12.83% versus a gain of 15.86% for QQQ.
Over three years, EFV compounded at +22.26% per year against +24.15% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +13.82% and +14.16% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +14.84% annualized vs +6.25%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EFV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.1% compared with 18.4% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -74.5% for EFV and -53.5% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFV charges 0.31% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $31 vs $18 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFV currently yields 4.47% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
1.8% of EFV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings EFV also owns.
EFV and QQQ share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 404 positions we hold weights for in EFV and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 427 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 94 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for EFV (96.9% of the fund), and 10 for EFV that do not appear in QQQ (3.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EFV | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROPRoper Technologies Inc. | 1.82% | 0.17% | 1.65% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EFV and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFV or QQQ?
EFV has an expense ratio of 0.31% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EFV or QQQ?
Over the past year EFV returned +23.44% vs +22.63% for QQQ, so EFV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), EFV annualized +6.25% vs +14.84% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EFV or QQQ?
EFV has been the more volatile fund at 36.1% annualized versus 18.4% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: EFV -74.5% vs QQQ -53.5%.
Should I hold both EFV and QQQ?
EFV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EFV and QQQ?
1.8% of EFV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.2% of QQQ's is in holdings EFV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 404 positions we hold weights for in EFV and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFV or QQQ?
EFV yields 4.47% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EFV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EFV?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. EFV led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EFV is less concentrated, with 19.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.