EFV vs QQQ

EFV vs QQQ

Which is better, EFV or QQQ?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. EFV led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, QQQ over the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEFVQQQ
Expense Ratio0.31%0.18%Best
AUM$30.7B$437.3B
Dividend Yield4.59%0.43%
Holdings842208
YTD Return+14.44%Best+12.62%
1Y Return+18.97%Best+11.32%
3Y Return (annualized)+23.81%Best+22.90%
5Y Return (annualized)+14.03%Best+12.43%
Volatility (annualized)17.9%Best18.4%
Max Drawdown-63.9%-53.5%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$19,279Best$17,964
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Growth
InceptionAug 1, 2005Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 5, 2005 to Nov 12, 2026 (21.3 years).

EFV vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 21.3 years both funds cover.

EFV vs QQQ Performance

iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EFV returned +18.97% while QQQ returned +11.32%. Year to date, EFV is up 14.44% versus a gain of 12.62% for QQQ.

Over three years, EFV compounded at +23.81% per year against +22.90% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +14.03% and +12.43% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +14.56% annualized vs +6.04%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 17.9% for EFV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.9% for EFV and -53.5% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EFV charges 0.31% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $31 vs $18 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFV currently yields 4.59% against 0.43% for QQQ.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of EFV and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

EFVQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EFV or QQQ?

EFV has an expense ratio of 0.31% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, EFV or QQQ?

Over the past year EFV returned +18.97% vs +11.32% for QQQ, so EFV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), EFV annualized +6.04% vs +14.56% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, EFV or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 17.9% for EFV. Worst drawdown: EFV -63.9% vs QQQ -53.5%.

Should I hold both EFV and QQQ?

EFV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, EFV or QQQ?

EFV yields 4.59% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so EFV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than EFV?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. EFV led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, QQQ over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.