EFV vs VOO

EFV vs VOO

Which is better, EFV or VOO?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. EFV led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VOO over the full window.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEFVVOO
Expense Ratio0.31%0.03%Best
AUM$30.7B$1.0T
Dividend Yield4.59%1.05%
Holdings842519
YTD Return+14.86%Best+11.31%
1Y Return+20.27%Best+13.49%
3Y Return (annualized)+22.95%Best+20.46%
5Y Return (annualized)+14.17%Best+11.61%
Volatility (annualized)15.9%14.0%Best
Max Drawdown-43.2%-34.3%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$19,398Best$17,319
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 1, 2005Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Nov 13, 2026 (16.2 years).

EFV vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.2 years both funds cover.

EFV vs VOO Performance

iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EFV returned +20.27% while VOO returned +13.49%. Year to date, EFV is up 14.86% versus a gain of 11.31% for VOO.

Over three years, EFV compounded at +22.95% per year against +20.46% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +14.17% and +11.61% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.18% annualized vs +7.54%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

EFV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 14.0% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.2% for EFV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EFV charges 0.31% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $31 vs $3 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFV currently yields 4.59% against 1.05% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of EFV and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

EFVVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EFV or VOO?

EFV has an expense ratio of 0.31% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, EFV or VOO?

Over the past year EFV returned +20.27% vs +13.49% for VOO, so EFV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EFV annualized +7.54% vs +13.18% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, EFV or VOO?

EFV has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 14.0% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EFV -43.2% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both EFV and VOO?

EFV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, EFV or VOO?

EFV yields 4.59% while VOO yields 1.05%, so EFV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than EFV?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. EFV led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VOO over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.