EIS vs VTI
iShares MSCI Israel ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EIS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EIS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $912M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.56% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 129 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +10.50% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +37.36% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +32.79% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.74% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 26, 2008 | May 24, 2001 |
EIS vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EIS returned +37.36% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, EIS is up 10.50% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, EIS compounded at +32.79% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.74% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EIS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.9% for EIS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EIS charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EIS currently yields 1.56% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EIS and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2909 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EIS or VTI?
EIS has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EIS or VTI?
Over the past year EIS returned +37.36% vs +22.17% for VTI, so EIS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), EIS annualized +5.40% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EIS or VTI?
EIS has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EIS -51.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EIS and VTI?
EIS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EIS and VTI?
EIS and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2909 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EIS or VTI?
EIS yields 1.56% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EIS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.