EJAN vs VXUS
EJAN vs VXUS
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EJAN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $143M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +6.20% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.66% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.20% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.60% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 1, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
EJAN vs VXUS Performance
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January (EJAN) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EJAN returned +11.66% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, EJAN is up 6.20% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, EJAN compounded at +8.20% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +3.60% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +4.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.1% for EJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.2% for EJAN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EJAN charges 0.89% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $5 annually, a gap of $84 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EJAN currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EJAN or VXUS?
EJAN has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $84 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EJAN or VXUS?
Over the past year EJAN returned +11.66% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), EJAN annualized +4.48% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EJAN or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.1% for EJAN. Worst drawdown: EJAN -22.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EJAN and VXUS?
EJAN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, EJAN or VXUS?
EJAN yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.