EKG vs IVV
First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EKG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 39 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +11.10% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.29% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.51% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 22, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
EKG vs IVV Performance
First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EKG returned +21.29% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, EKG is up 11.10% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, EKG compounded at +8.51% per year against +22.19% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +1.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EKG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.8% for EKG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EKG charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EKG currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EKG and IVV share 7 holdings out of 536 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EKG or IVV?
EKG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EKG or IVV?
Over the past year EKG returned +21.29% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), EKG annualized +1.38% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EKG or IVV?
EKG has been the more volatile fund at 26.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EKG -43.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EKG and IVV?
EKG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EKG and IVV?
EKG and IVV share 7 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 536 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EKG or IVV?
EKG yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.