EMAG vs QQQ
Emerging Markets AI MAG 3 ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EMAG or QQQ?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMAG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $457,454.87 | $476.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 325 | 312 |
| YTD Return | -1.94% | +11.27%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +12.28% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% |
| Fund Family | EMQQ ETF | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
EMAG vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EMAG vs QQQ Performance
Emerging Markets AI MAG 3 ETF (EMAG) is an ETF from EMQQ ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, EMAG is down 1.94% versus a gain of 11.27% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMAG charges 0.76% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $18 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMAG currently yields 0.00% against 0.43% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in EMAG and 101 in QQQ, totalling 111.6% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in EMAG and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 325 and 312.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMAG and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMAG or QQQ?
EMAG has an expense ratio of 0.76% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $58 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMAG or QQQ?
EMAG yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EMAG?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.