EMAG vs VTI
Emerging Markets AI MAG 3 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EMAG or VTI?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMAG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $457,454.87 | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 325 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | -1.94% | +11.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +13.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.19% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.49% |
| Fund Family | EMQQ ETF | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
EMAG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EMAG vs VTI Performance
Emerging Markets AI MAG 3 ETF (EMAG) is an ETF from EMQQ ETF and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, EMAG is down 1.94% versus a gain of 11.29% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMAG charges 0.76% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $3 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMAG currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in EMAG and 3,469 in VTI, totalling 111.6% and 96.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in EMAG and 3,469 in VTI, against full books of 325 and 3,542.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMAG and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMAG or VTI?
EMAG has an expense ratio of 0.76% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $73 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMAG or VTI?
EMAG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EMAG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.