EMC vs VTI
Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $55M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.56% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 77 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +15.03% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.09% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.52% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
EMC vs VTI Performance
Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMC returned +25.09% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, EMC is up 15.03% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, EMC compounded at +14.52% per year against +21.17% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, EMC has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for EMC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMC charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMC currently yields 0.56% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EMC and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2851 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMC or VTI?
EMC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMC or VTI?
Over the past year EMC returned +25.09% vs +23.31% for VTI, so EMC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), EMC annualized +13.11% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMC or VTI?
EMC has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EMC -18.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EMC and VTI?
EMC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMC and VTI?
EMC and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2851 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMC or VTI?
EMC yields 0.56% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.