EMC vs VOO
Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EMC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $55M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.56% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 77 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +14.83% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.87% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.24% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2010 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EMC vs VOO Performance
Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF (EMC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMC returned +24.87% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, EMC is up 14.83% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, EMC compounded at +14.24% per year against +21.78% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +13.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for EMC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMC charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMC currently yields 0.56% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EMC and VOO share 0 holdings out of 573 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMC or VOO?
EMC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMC or VOO?
Over the past year EMC returned +24.87% vs +23.01% for VOO, so EMC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), EMC annualized +13.06% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMC or VOO?
EMC has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EMC -18.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EMC and VOO?
EMC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMC and VOO?
EMC and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 573 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMC or VOO?
EMC yields 0.56% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.