EMDV vs IVV
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EMDV or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EMDV is less concentrated, with 23.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMDV | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $7M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.88% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 49 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -2.14% | +13.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.20% | +17.38%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.60% | +22.67%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.70% | +13.13%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.2% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,721 | $18,531Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.4%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | ProShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 25, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 27, 2016 to Sep 24, 2026 (10.7 years).
EMDV vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.7 years both funds cover.
EMDV vs IVV Performance
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) is an ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EMDV returned +1.20% while IVV returned +17.38%. Year to date, EMDV is down 2.14% versus a gain of 13.23% for IVV.
Over three years, EMDV compounded at +3.60% per year against +22.67% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -2.70% and +13.13% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.95% annualized vs +3.42%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.2% for EMDV and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMDV charges 0.60% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMDV currently yields 1.88% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 46 holdings in EMDV and 490 in IVV, totalling 99.4% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in EMDV and 490 in IVV, against full books of 49 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 482 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EMDV (98.6% of the fund), and 1 for EMDV that do not appear in IVV (2.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMDV and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMDV or IVV?
EMDV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMDV or IVV?
Over the past year EMDV returned +1.20% vs +17.38% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), EMDV annualized +3.42% vs +14.95% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMDV or IVV?
EMDV has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EMDV -39.2% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both EMDV and IVV?
EMDV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMDV or IVV?
EMDV yields 1.88% while IVV yields 1.06%, so EMDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EMDV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EMDV is less concentrated, with 23.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.