EMDV vs IVV
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMDV | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.99% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 49 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +1.43% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.92% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.45% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.84% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 25, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
EMDV vs IVV Performance
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) is a ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EMDV returned +3.92% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, EMDV is up 1.43% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Over three years, EMDV compounded at +3.45% per year against +21.55% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -1.84% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.2% for EMDV and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMDV charges 0.60% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMDV currently yields 1.99% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EMDV and IVV share 0 holdings out of 553 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMDV or IVV?
EMDV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMDV or IVV?
Over the past year EMDV returned +3.92% vs +21.64% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), EMDV annualized +3.81% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMDV or IVV?
EMDV has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EMDV -39.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EMDV and IVV?
EMDV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMDV and IVV?
EMDV and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 553 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMDV or IVV?
EMDV yields 1.99% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EMDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.