EMDV vs VYM
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 568 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMDV | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $7M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.99% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 49 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +1.39% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.44% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.44% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.96% | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 25, 2016 | Nov 10, 2006 |
EMDV vs VYM Performance
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMDV returned +3.44% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, EMDV is up 1.39% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, EMDV compounded at +3.44% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -1.96% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.11% annualized vs +3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.2% for EMDV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMDV charges 0.60% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $4 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMDV currently yields 1.99% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
EMDV and VYM share 0 holdings out of 606 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMDV or VYM?
EMDV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMDV or VYM?
Over the past year EMDV returned +3.44% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), EMDV annualized +3.81% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMDV or VYM?
EMDV has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EMDV -39.2% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both EMDV and VYM?
EMDV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMDV and VYM?
EMDV and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 606 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMDV or VYM?
EMDV yields 1.99% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.