EMDV vs VXUS
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMDV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $7M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.99% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 49 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +1.43% | +15.00% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.92% | +26.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.45% | +19.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.84% | +9.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 25, 2016 | Jan 26, 2011 |
EMDV vs VXUS Performance
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMDV returned +3.92% while VXUS returned +26.87%. Year to date, EMDV is up 1.43% versus a gain of 15.00% for VXUS.
Over three years, EMDV compounded at +3.45% per year against +19.79% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -1.84% and +9.26% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.88% annualized vs +3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.2% for EMDV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMDV charges 0.60% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $5 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMDV currently yields 1.99% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
EMDV and VXUS share 27 holdings out of 7882 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMDV or VXUS?
EMDV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMDV or VXUS?
Over the past year EMDV returned +3.92% vs +26.87% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), EMDV annualized +3.81% vs +4.88% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMDV or VXUS?
EMDV has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: EMDV -39.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EMDV and VXUS?
EMDV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMDV and VXUS?
EMDV and VXUS share 27 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7882 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMDV or VXUS?
EMDV yields 1.99% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.