EMEQ vs SCHD
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, EMEQ or SCHD?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. EMEQ led over 1Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMEQ | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $633M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.71% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 66 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +61.85%Best | +23.60% |
| 1Y Return | +94.86%Best | +28.29% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.25% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.25% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.4% | 13.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -26.3% | -16.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $27,739Best | $13,083 |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.8% | 41.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Macquarie Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 4, 2024 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 5, 2024 to Sep 21, 2026 (2 years).
EMEQ vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
EMEQ vs SCHD Performance
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) is an ETF from Macquarie Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year EMEQ returned +94.86% while SCHD returned +28.29%. Year to date, EMEQ is up 61.85% versus a gain of 23.60% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMEQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.4% compared with 13.9% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.3% for EMEQ and -16.1% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.22. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMEQ charges 0.85% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $6 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMEQ currently yields 1.71% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 59 holdings in EMEQ and 100 in SCHD, totalling 100.5% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in EMEQ and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 66 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 99 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for EMEQ (99.9% of the fund), and 9 for EMEQ that do not appear in SCHD (7.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMEQ and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMEQ or SCHD?
EMEQ has an expense ratio of 0.85% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $79 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMEQ or SCHD?
Over the past year EMEQ returned +94.86% vs +28.29% for SCHD, so EMEQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EMEQ annualized +66.55% vs +14.38% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMEQ or SCHD?
EMEQ has been the more volatile fund at 33.4% annualized versus 13.9% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: EMEQ -26.3% vs SCHD -16.1%.
Should I hold both EMEQ and SCHD?
EMEQ and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.22, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMEQ or SCHD?
EMEQ yields 1.71% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than EMEQ?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. EMEQ led over 1Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.