EMEQ vs VTI
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMEQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMEQ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.86% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $581M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.55% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 60 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +48.70% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +108.76% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Macquarie Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 4, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
EMEQ vs VTI Performance
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) is a ETF from Macquarie Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMEQ returned +108.76% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, EMEQ is up 48.70% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMEQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.3% for EMEQ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMEQ charges 0.86% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $86 vs $3 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMEQ currently yields 1.55% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EMEQ and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2835 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMEQ or VTI?
EMEQ has an expense ratio of 0.86% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $83 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMEQ or VTI?
Over the past year EMEQ returned +108.76% vs +23.31% for VTI, so EMEQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EMEQ annualized +64.20% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMEQ or VTI?
EMEQ has been the more volatile fund at 34.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EMEQ -26.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EMEQ and VTI?
EMEQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMEQ and VTI?
EMEQ and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2835 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMEQ or VTI?
EMEQ yields 1.55% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EMEQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.